Title: Amaryllis Bud Photography Flower Archival Print By Artist Mark Fields
Shipping: $35.00
Artist: N/A
Period: Contemporary
History: N/A
Origin: N/A
Condition: Museum Quality
Item Date: 2007
Item ID: 6361
Amaryllis Bud by artist Mark Fields is a Fine Art Photograph that gives sensuousness and almost erotic power to a simple flower, and unopened Amaryllis. Having studied painting at one of Americas leading art schools, Mark Fields has the mind of a painter and has applied his knowledge of photography to creating this timeless image. The image was photographed using a medium format camera, specifically a Mamiya 645 Pro using medium format black and white film. This film size is 3 times that of 35mm film. The film frame was scanned on an Imacon film scanner, one of the highest end professional film scanners which extracts the highest level digital information. This is an archival pigment print on Exhibition Fine Art Paper made by Epson. The surface of this paper is low gloss with a slight elegant texture reminiscent of a traditional darkroom "Fiber" paper. The print image is pure neutral Black and White. The weight of this paper is a medium heavy weight 325 g/m2 and it is 13ml thick. The print is signed on the back in pencil with artists name, date the image was created and the Edition No. 4 out of an Edition of 30. Actual image size is Wd. 8.5" by Ht. 11.3" on 11" x 15" paper allowing for a substantial blank area around the image which allows for easy mounting. The print is left unmatted giving the owner the ability to have it framed to meet their own vision. My primary technical concern in my flower photographs was the use of light as a way of achieving chiaroscuro, using a timeless technique to illuminate the uniqueness of each flower. One can follow my inspiration in the work of Weston, Mapplethorpe, Blossfeldt and Renger-Patzsch. Â I establish a "relationship" with the flowers while I am working with them: in time they tell me how to capture them. Each flower has a personality unique as any person, animal or landscape. Their beauty and power come from the "actual exactness" of what they are. Â Rather than trying to obscure them by imposing photographic techniques that camouflage their precise characteristic, their magnificence comes from showing the geometry, forms, textures as a given. Using the technique of chiaroscuro, which has been used by some of the greatest artists in history as a way of creating drama, my desire is to accentuate exactly what they are, but in a dramatic way.
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine_art_photography
Fine art photography is photography created in accordance with the vision of the artist as photographer. Fine art photography stands in contrast to representational photography, such as photojournalism, which provides a documentary visual account of specific subjects and events, literally re-presenting objective reality rather than the subjective intent of the photographer; and commercial photography, the primary focus of which is to advertise products or services.One photography historian claimed that "the earliest exponent of 'Fine Art' or composition photography was John Edwin Mayall, "who exhibited daguerrotypes illustrating the Lord's Prayer in 1851".[15] Successful attempts to make fine art photography can be traced to Victorian era practitioners such as Julia Margaret Cameron, Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, and Oscar Gustave Rejlander and others. In the U.S. F. Holland Day, Alfred Stieglitz and Edward Steichen were instrumental in making photography a fine art, and Steiglitz was especially notable in introducing it into museum collections. In the UK as recently as 1960, photography was not really recognised as a Fine Art. Dr S.D.Jouhar said, when he formed the Photographic Fine Art Association at that time - "At the moment photography is not generally recognized as anything more than a craft. In the USA photography has been openly accepted as Fine Art in certain official quarters. It is shown in galleries and exhibitions as an Art. There is not corresponding recognition in this country. The London Salon shows pictorial photography, but it is not generally understood as an art. Whether a work shows aesthetic qualities or not it is designated 'Pictorial Photography' which is a very ambiguous term. The photographer himself must have confidence in his work and in its dignity and aesthetic value, to force recognition as an Art rather than a Craft" Until the late 1970s several genres predominated, such as; nudes, portraits, natural landscapes (exemplified by Ansel Adams). Breakthrough 'star' artists in the 1970s and 80s, such as Sally Mann, Robert Mapplethorpe, and Cindy Sherman, still relied heavily on such genres, although seeing them with fresh eyes. Others investigated a snapshot aesthetic approach. American organizations, such as the Aperture Foundation and the Museum of Modern Art, have done much to keep photography at the forefront of the fine arts.